new disks added to 7400

mohuddle
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 4:43 pm

Re: new disks added to 7400

Post by mohuddle »

Davidkn wrote:Be interested to know how long this tunesys takes please.


It's still running...so close to 24-hours and it's on tune 2 of 4
"Tune 2 of 4 started..."

Tune 1 finished after about 12-hours. On the first tune, I ran a showtask -d 123 on the initial tunesys task...then it spun off task 124, so showtask -d 124.

Came in this morning, and task 124 was done, so I ran a showtask to see all of them and there was this guy

482 background_command tunenodech active 1/2 389/1831

389 of 1831 GBs to move...I'll report back at the end of the day.
mohuddle
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 4:43 pm

Re: new disks added to 7400

Post by mohuddle »

2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated 1769/1831 GB (1769/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated
2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated No further chunklets can be moved for the current set of disks
2015-01-20 15:33:02 CST Updated
2015-01-20 15:33:04 CST Updated
2015-01-20 15:33:04 CST Updated Target moves to achieve node balance: 1831 GB (1831 chunklets).
2015-01-20 15:35:43 CST Updated 1779/1831 GB (1779/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)

skipping ahead a bit...

2015-01-20 16:13:45 CST Updated 1916/1831 GB (1916/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
2015-01-20 16:16:20 CST Updated 1926/1831 GB (1926/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
2015-01-20 16:18:15 CST Updated 1936/1831 GB (1936/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
RitonLaBevue
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:01 am

Re: new disks added to 7400

Post by RitonLaBevue »

Architect wrote:
RitonLaBevue wrote:Rather than tunesys which must be run a lot of times before having nice results, we use tunevv.


from what i've seen, that issue is finally fixed in 3.2.1
tunesys had some issues tuning R6 before that release.



You mean tunesys really balance datas through pds ?
Architect
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:25 pm

Re: new disks added to 7400

Post by Architect »

RitonLaBevue wrote:
Architect wrote:
RitonLaBevue wrote:Rather than tunesys which must be run a lot of times before having nice results, we use tunevv.


from what i've seen, that issue is finally fixed in 3.2.1
tunesys had some issues tuning R6 before that release.



You mean tunesys really balance datas through pds ?


Yes, and from what i saw, it does it quite nicely as well. As long as the system is balanced of course.
The goal is to achieve the best results by following the clients wishes. If they want to have a house build upside down standing on its chimney, it's up to you to figure out how do it, while still making it usable.
RitonLaBevue
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:01 am

Re: new disks added to 7400

Post by RitonLaBevue »

Nice, just have to wait for PD upgrade on 3.2.1 then ^^
Post Reply